Please wait a moment................... | |
|
| Statistics of the project "CBTS 2009 Event Evaluation" | 10 Feb 2010 11:40 |
| [+] Legend |
| Question: When did you arrive to Brunico? (Date of arrival) |
| Count | Percent | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Before Tuesday, December 15 (1) | 14 | 28.57% | |
| Tuesday, December 15 (2) | 22 | 44.90% | |
| Wednesday, December 16 (3) | 10 | 20.41% | |
| Thursday, December 17 (4) | 2 | 4.08% | |
| Friday, December 18 (5) | 1 | 2.04% | |
| Saturday, December 19 (6) | 0 | 0.00% | |
| TOTAL | 49 | ||
| invalid (missing) | 3 | ||
| Average value | 2.06 | ||
| N = 54 | n = 52 | sys-missing = 2 | |||
| Question: When did you depart from Brunico? (Date of departure) |
| Count | Percent | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Thursday, December 17 (3) | 6 | 12.24% | |
| Friday, December 18 (4) | 12 | 24.49% | |
| Saturday, December 19 (5) | 20 | 40.82% | |
| Sunday, December 20 (6) | 10 | 20.41% | |
| After Sunday, December 20 (9) | 1 | 2.04% | |
| TOTAL | 49 | ||
| invalid (missing) | 2 | ||
| Average value | 4.80 | ||
| N = 54 | n = 51 | sys-missing = 3 | |||
| Question: Which days did you attend the CBTS conference? Please select all answers that apply. |
| Count | Percent | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Tuesday, December 15 - afternoon | 22 | 43.14% | |
| Wednesday, December 16 - afternoon | 44 | 86.27% | |
| Thursday, December 17 | 46 | 90.20% | |
| Friday, December 18 - morning | 40 | 78.43% | |
| Saturday, December 19 | 10 | 19.61% | |
| N = 54 | n = 51 | sys-missing = 3 | |||
| Question: In your opinion, the overall length of the conference (two full and three half days) was: |
| Count | Percent | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Too short (1) | 0 | 0.00% | |
| Just right (2) | 41 | 85.42% | |
| Too long (3) | 7 | 14.58% | |
| TOTAL | 48 | ||
| invalid (missing) | 3 | ||
| Average value | 2.15 | ||
| N = 54 | n = 51 | sys-missing = 3 | |||
| Question: In thinking about the number of social events offered, would you say there was: |
| Count | Percent | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Too few social events (1) | 8 | 16.33% | |
| Just the right amount of social events (2) | 40 | 81.63% | |
| Too many social events (3) | 1 | 2.04% | |
| TOTAL | 49 | ||
| invalid (missing) | 2 | ||
| Average value | 1.86 | ||
| N = 54 | n = 51 | sys-missing = 3 | |||
| Question: Which of the following options best reflects your overall evaluation about CBTS 2009? |
| Count | Percent | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Excellent (1) | 13 | 26.53% | |
| Good (2) | 30 | 61.22% | |
| Fair (3) | 5 | 10.20% | |
| Poor (4) | 0 | 0.00% | |
| Very poor (5) | 1 | 2.04% | |
| TOTAL | 49 | ||
| invalid (missing) | 2 | ||
| Average value | 1.90 | ||
| N = 54 | n = 51 | sys-missing = 3 | |||
| Question: In thinking about the number of paper/poster sessions offered, would you say there was: |
| Count | Percent | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Too few paper/poster sessions (1) | 3 | 6.00% | |
| Just the right amount of paper/poster sessions (2) | 41 | 82.00% | |
| Too many paper/poster sessions (3) | 6 | 12.00% | |
| TOTAL | 50 | ||
| invalid (missing) | 1 | ||
| Average value | 2.06 | ||
| N = 54 | n = 51 | sys-missing = 3 | |||
| Question: In terms of arranging the session slots, what would have been your preference for CBTS 2009? |
| Count | Percent | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Have multiple paper sessions at the same time (1) | 37 | 75.51% | |
| Have only single-track paper sessions (2) | 12 | 24.49% | |
| TOTAL | 49 | ||
| invalid (missing) | 1 | ||
| Average value | 1.24 | ||
| N = 54 | n = 50 | sys-missing = 4 | |||
| Question: Which of the following options do you prefer for the next CBTS conference? |
| Count | Percent | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| same number of papers, concurrent sessions, fewer days (1) | 11 | 23.91% | |
| more papers, concurrent sessions, same number of days (2) | 20 | 43.48% | |
| same number of papers, no concurrent sessions, same number of days (3) | 10 | 21.74% | |
| fewer papers, no concurrent sessions, fewer days (5) | 5 | 10.87% | |
| TOTAL | 46 | ||
| invalid (missing) | 4 | ||
| Average value | 2.30 | ||
| N = 54 | n = 50 | sys-missing = 4 | |||
| Question: Did you attend any of the keynote speeches? |
| Count | Percent | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes (1) | 47 | 94.00% | |
| No (2) | 3 | 6.00% | |
| TOTAL | 50 | ||
| invalid (missing) | 0 | ||
| Average value | 1.06 | ||
| N = 54 | n = 50 | sys-missing = 4 | |||
| Question: Which keynote speeche(s) did you attend? Please check all that apply. |
| Count | Percent | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Wednesday - Geoffrey Crouch - The Darwinian Origins of Tourism Consumer Behavior | 35 | 74.47% | |
| Thursday - Sara Dolnicar - Segmentation Methods in Tourism | 39 | 82.98% | |
| Thursday - Abraham Pizam - Consumer Attitudes towards Animal- Based Tourist Attractions | 32 | 68.09% | |
| Friday - Charles Hofacker - Consumer Behavior Online | 29 | 61.70% | |
| N = 54 | n = 47 | sys-missing = 7 | |||
| Question: How useful were the following keynote speech topics for yourself? |
| very useful (1) | somwhat useful (2) | not very useful (3) | not at all useful (4) | don't know (5) | did not attend (6) | Total | Average value | Missing |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | ||||||||||||
| Geoffrey Crouch The Darwinian Origins of Tourism Consumer Behavior |
(12) |
(12) |
(10) |
(0) |
(2) |
(8) |
|||||||
| Sara Dolnicar Segmentation Methods in Tourism |
(29) |
(6) |
(3) |
(0) |
(0) |
(4) |
|||||||
| Abraham Pizam Consumer Attitudes towards Animal- Based Tourist Attractions |
(8) |
(12) |
(11) |
(1) |
(0) |
(10) |
|||||||
| Charles Hofacker Consumer Behavior Online |
(11) |
(15) |
(3) |
(0) |
(1) |
(11) |
|||||||
|
|||||||||||||
| Question: Did you attend any of the paper sessions? |
| Count | Percent | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes (1) | 46 | 92.00% | |
| No (2) | 4 | 8.00% | |
| TOTAL | 50 | ||
| invalid (missing) | 0 | ||
| Average value | 1.08 | ||
| N = 54 | n = 50 | sys-missing = 4 | |||
| Question: Which paper session(s) did you attend? Please choose all that apply. |
| Count | Percent | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Satisfaction | 30 | 65.22% | |
| Experience Management | 18 | 39.13% | |
| Alpine and Rural Tourism | 16 | 34.78% | |
| Travel Motives | 23 | 50.00% | |
| Image and Branding | 29 | 63.04% | |
| Well-Being and Quality-of-Life | 20 | 43.48% | |
| Wine and Gastronomy Tourism | 9 | 19.57% | |
| Dark Tourism and Crisis Management | 15 | 32.61% | |
| Technology Usage | 16 | 34.78% | |
| Social Interactions | 15 | 32.61% | |
| N = 54 | n = 46 | sys-missing = 8 | |||
| Question: How would you evaluate the overall quality of the paper sessions you attended? |
| Count | Percent | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Excellent (1) | 4 | 8.89% | |
| Good (2) | 30 | 66.67% | |
| Fair (3) | 11 | 24.44% | |
| Poor (4) | 0 | 0.00% | |
| Very poor (5) | 0 | 0.00% | |
| Did not attend any (6) | 0 | 0.00% | |
| TOTAL | 45 | ||
| invalid (missing) | 1 | ||
| Average value | 2.16 | ||
| N = 54 | n = 46 | sys-missing = 8 | |||
| Question: Did you visit any of the poster sessions? |
| Count | Percent | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes (1) | 31 | 62.00% | |
| No (2) | 19 | 38.00% | |
| TOTAL | 50 | ||
| invalid (missing) | 0 | ||
| Average value | 1.38 | ||
| N = 54 | n = 50 | sys-missing = 4 | |||
| Question: How would you evaluate the overall quality of the poster sessions you attended: |
| Count | Percent | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Excellent (1) | 3 | 10.34% | |
| Good (2) | 12 | 41.38% | |
| Fair (3) | 11 | 37.93% | |
| Poor (4) | 3 | 10.34% | |
| Very Poor (5) | 0 | 0.00% | |
| TOTAL | 29 | ||
| invalid (missing) | 2 | ||
| Average value | 2.48 | ||
| N = 54 | n = 31 | sys-missing = 23 | |||
| Question: Here is the list of topics covered at this conference. In your opinion, which topics should have been treated more deeply? Please check all that apply. |
| Count | Percent | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Issues in well-being and quality-of-life research with a special emphasis on tourism | 17 | 34.00% | |
| Co-creation and Tourist 2.0: Behavior and role in tourism value chains and distribution channels | 14 | 28.00% | |
| Social influences on touristic experiences and behaviors | 31 | 62.00% | |
| Cognitive representations of destinations at various levels and their affective/behavioral consequences | 22 | 44.00% | |
| Wine and gastronomy tourism: Contemporary issues and trends | 8 | 16.00% | |
| Methodological aspects in assessing consumption-related constructs in tourism | 34 | 68.00% | |
| Empirical generalizations and meta-analysis in tourism and hospitality research | 10 | 20.00% | |
| Evaluation research applied to tourism and hospitality | 16 | 32.00% | |
| Web-based and mobile technology in tourism and hospitality | 17 | 34.00% | |
| N = 54 | n = 50 | sys-missing = 4 | |||
| Question: Which topics should have been skipped? Please check all that apply. |
| Count | Percent | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Issues in well-being and quality-of-life research with a special emphasis on tourism | 4 | 8.00% | |
| Co-creation and Tourist 2.0: Behavior and role in tourism value chains and distribution channels | 1 | 2.00% | |
| Social influences on touristic experiences and behaviors | 0 | 0.00% | |
| Cognitive representations of destinations at various levels and their affective/behavioral consequences | 1 | 2.00% | |
| Wine and gastronomy tourism: Contemporary issues and trends | 7 | 14.00% | |
| Methodological aspects in assessing consumption-related constructs in tourism | 1 | 2.00% | |
| Empirical generalizations and meta-analysis in tourism and hospitality research | 2 | 4.00% | |
| Evaluation research applied to tourism and hospitality | 5 | 10.00% | |
| Web-based and mobile technology in tourism and hospitality | 5 | 10.00% | |
| N = 54 | n = 50 | sys-missing = 4 | |||
| Question: Were you an (co-)author of a poster presentation at the conference? |
| Count | Percent | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes (1) | 10 | 20.00% | |
| No (2) | 40 | 80.00% | |
| TOTAL | 50 | ||
| invalid (missing) | 0 | ||
| Average value | 1.80 | ||
| N = 54 | n = 50 | sys-missing = 4 | |||
| Question: Did you present a paper or a poster at the conference? |
| Count | Percent | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes, paper | 35 | 70.00% | |
| Yes, poster | 8 | 16.00% | |
| No | 12 | 24.00% | |
| N = 54 | n = 50 | sys-missing = 4 | |||
| Question: How would you evaluate the organization of the conference in general? |
| Count | Percent | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Excellent (1) | 30 | 60.00% | |
| Good (2) | 18 | 36.00% | |
| Fair (3) | 1 | 2.00% | |
| Poor (4) | 0 | 0.00% | |
| Very poor (5) | 1 | 2.00% | |
| TOTAL | 50 | ||
| invalid (missing) | 0 | ||
| Average value | 1.48 | ||
| N = 54 | n = 50 | sys-missing = 4 | |||
| Question: How satisfied were you with the ... |
| Not at all satisfied (1) | Somewhat unsatisfied (2) | Somewhat satisfied (3) | Very satisfied (4) | Total | Average value | Missing |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | ||||||||||
| Conference venue (the University building) | (0) |
(0) |
(12) |
(36) |
|||||||
| Reception desk services | (0) |
(1) |
(13) |
(34) |
|||||||
| Conference room | (0) |
(3) |
(11) |
(34) |
|||||||
| Refreshments served at coffee breaks | (0) |
(3) |
(20) |
(25) |
|||||||
| Length of coffee breaks | (1) |
(3) |
(14) |
(30) |
|||||||
| Served dinner | (4) |
(4) |
(8) |
(24) |
|||||||
| Your accommodation | (0) |
(1) |
(10) |
(36) |
|||||||
| Your travel arrangements | (2) |
(6) |
(19) |
(20) |
|||||||
|
|||||||||||
| Question: Four social events were offered during the conference. Please indicate those social events you participated in. |
| Count | Percent | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Early-Birds Get Together | 22 | 44.00% | |
| Christmas Market Visit | 39 | 78.00% | |
| South Tyrolian Dinner | 36 | 72.00% | |
| Swimming and Sauna at the Cron 4 | 2 | 4.00% | |
| Skiing at the Kronplatz Ski Resort | 15 | 30.00% | |
| N = 54 | n = 50 | sys-missing = 4 | |||
| Question: Please evaluate the quality of each of the social events you attended. |
| Exellent (1) | Good (2) | Fair (3) | Poor (4) | Very poor (5) | Did not attend (6) | Total | Average value | Missing |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | ||||||||||||
| Early Birds Get Together | (10) |
(10) |
(2) |
(0) |
(0) |
(0) |
|||||||
| Christmas Market Visit | (4) |
(11) |
(3) |
(0) |
(0) |
(2) |
|||||||
| South Tyrolean Dinner | (11) |
(2) |
(1) |
(1) |
(2) |
(3) |
|||||||
| Swimming and Sauna at the Cron 4 | (2) |
(0) |
(0) |
(0) |
(0) |
(10) |
|||||||
| Skiing at the Kronplatz Ski Resort | (3) |
(4) |
(0) |
(0) |
(0) |
(8) |
|||||||
|
|||||||||||||
| Question: One explicit goal of CBTS 2009 was to deepen and foster scientific exchange and collaboration. Did you make new promising contacts during CBTS 2009? |
| Count | Percent | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes (1) | 36 | 72.00% | |
| No (2) | 3 | 6.00% | |
| Not sure (3) | 11 | 22.00% | |
| TOTAL | 50 | ||
| invalid (missing) | 0 | ||
| Average value | 1.50 | ||
| N = 54 | n = 50 | sys-missing = 4 | |||
| Question: Did you deepen your existing contacts during CBTS 2009? |
| Count | Percent | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes (1) | 29 | 60.42% | |
| No (2) | 9 | 18.75% | |
| Not sure (3) | 10 | 20.83% | |
| TOTAL | 48 | ||
| invalid (missing) | 2 | ||
| Average value | 1.60 | ||
| N = 54 | n = 50 | sys-missing = 4 | |||
| Question: In your opinion, should there be a thrid CBTS conference? |
| Count | Percent | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes (1) | 48 | 96.00% | |
| No (2) | 2 | 4.00% | |
| TOTAL | 50 | ||
| invalid (missing) | 0 | ||
| Average value | 1.04 | ||
| N = 54 | n = 50 | sys-missing = 4 | |||
| Question: If CBTS is held again, how likely are you to attend and/or submit a paper? |
| Count | Percent | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Very likely (1) | 24 | 50.00% | |
| Somewhat likely (2) | 20 | 41.67% | |
| Somewhat unlikely (3) | 4 | 8.33% | |
| Very unlikely (4) | 0 | 0.00% | |
| TOTAL | 48 | ||
| invalid (missing) | 0 | ||
| Average value | 1.58 | ||
| N = 54 | n = 48 | sys-missing = 6 | |||